<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Australia adopts Chinese Internet policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.danwalmsley.com/2008/10/17/australia-adopts-chinese-internet-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2008/10/17/australia-adopts-chinese-internet-policy/</link>
	<description>Coding so you don&#039;t have to</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 06:20:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2008/10/17/australia-adopts-chinese-internet-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-16219</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwalmsley.com/?p=169#comment-16219</guid>
		<description>This is soo stupid. The Australian Government is so hypocritical. They critize the Chinese censorship but adopt the same policy and says its nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is soo stupid. The Australian Government is so hypocritical. They critize the Chinese censorship but adopt the same policy and says its nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trav</title>
		<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2008/10/17/australia-adopts-chinese-internet-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-14218</link>
		<dc:creator>trav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 09:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwalmsley.com/?p=169#comment-14218</guid>
		<description>Yeah, agreed.  
Even though those of us savvy enough to have blogs are generally going to also be savvy enough to get around whatever filtering mechanism is installed, it&#039;s still wrong on so many levels.  Will someone please think of the adults?!?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, agreed.<br />
Even though those of us savvy enough to have blogs are generally going to also be savvy enough to get around whatever filtering mechanism is installed, it&#8217;s still wrong on so many levels.  Will someone please think of the adults?!?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

