<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apache Wicket on Google App Engine for Java</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.danwalmsley.com/2009/04/08/apache-wicket-on-google-app-engine-for-java/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2009/04/08/apache-wicket-on-google-app-engine-for-java/</link>
	<description>Coding so you don&#039;t have to</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 06:20:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Looking at MVC frameworks &#171; cg2p</title>
		<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2009/04/08/apache-wicket-on-google-app-engine-for-java/comment-page-1/#comment-40124</link>
		<dc:creator>Looking at MVC frameworks &#171; cg2p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwalmsley.com/?p=220#comment-40124</guid>
		<description>[...] going to distract myself with this just yet though. I know it can work in App Engine from previous.  I&#8217;m going to get some basic application up and running first [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] going to distract myself with this just yet though. I know it can work in App Engine from previous.  I&#8217;m going to get some basic application up and running first [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Improve Performance By Using Keys Only Query on Google App Engine &#171; Making a better world with enterprise Java</title>
		<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2009/04/08/apache-wicket-on-google-app-engine-for-java/comment-page-1/#comment-39290</link>
		<dc:creator>Improve Performance By Using Keys Only Query on Google App Engine &#171; Making a better world with enterprise Java</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 09:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwalmsley.com/?p=220#comment-39290</guid>
		<description>[...] It has been around two months since we started to port an existing application on Google App engine. It used Hibernate for persistence, Wicket framework for web layer and Spring as an Ioc container. Looking at the will it play on appengine we had to change Hibernate to use either JPA or JDO. We decided on JPA purely on the basis of experience we had on JPA compared to JDO. Wicket is semi compatible and we made it work by the three standard workarounds described here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It has been around two months since we started to port an existing application on Google App engine. It used Hibernate for persistence, Wicket framework for web layer and Spring as an Ioc container. Looking at the will it play on appengine we had to change Hibernate to use either JPA or JDO. We decided on JPA purely on the basis of experience we had on JPA compared to JDO. Wicket is semi compatible and we made it work by the three standard workarounds described here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Managing Wicket Serialization Problem On Google App Engine &#171; Making a better world with enterprise Java</title>
		<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2009/04/08/apache-wicket-on-google-app-engine-for-java/comment-page-1/#comment-38991</link>
		<dc:creator>Managing Wicket Serialization Problem On Google App Engine &#171; Making a better world with enterprise Java</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 04:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwalmsley.com/?p=220#comment-38991</guid>
		<description>[...] App engine will it play suggests that if you have a wicket project you follow this workaround your Wicket project will start working on app engine. Still, one of the error you may [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] App engine will it play suggests that if you have a wicket project you follow this workaround your Wicket project will start working on app engine. Still, one of the error you may [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Managing Wicket Serialization Problem On Google App Engine &#171; Inphina Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2009/04/08/apache-wicket-on-google-app-engine-for-java/comment-page-1/#comment-36361</link>
		<dc:creator>Managing Wicket Serialization Problem On Google App Engine &#171; Inphina Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwalmsley.com/?p=220#comment-36361</guid>
		<description>[...] App engine will it play suggests that if you have a wicket project you follow this workaround your Wicket project will start working on app engine. Still, one of the error you may [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] App engine will it play suggests that if you have a wicket project you follow this workaround your Wicket project will start working on app engine. Still, one of the error you may [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Improve Performance By Using Keys Only Query on Google App Engine &#171; Inphina Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2009/04/08/apache-wicket-on-google-app-engine-for-java/comment-page-1/#comment-36004</link>
		<dc:creator>Improve Performance By Using Keys Only Query on Google App Engine &#171; Inphina Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 13:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwalmsley.com/?p=220#comment-36004</guid>
		<description>[...] It has been around two months since we started to port an existing application on Google App engine. It used Hibernate for persistence, Wicket framework for web layer and Spring as an Ioc container. Looking at the will it play on appengine we had to change Hibernate to use either JPA or JDO. We decided on JPA purely on the basis of experience we had on JPA compared to JDO. Wicket is semi compatible and we made it work by the three standard workarounds described here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It has been around two months since we started to port an existing application on Google App engine. It used Hibernate for persistence, Wicket framework for web layer and Spring as an Ioc container. Looking at the will it play on appengine we had to change Hibernate to use either JPA or JDO. We decided on JPA purely on the basis of experience we had on JPA compared to JDO. Wicket is semi compatible and we made it work by the three standard workarounds described here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Generating Excel Files On Google App Engine For A Wicket Application &#171; Inphina Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2009/04/08/apache-wicket-on-google-app-engine-for-java/comment-page-1/#comment-35970</link>
		<dc:creator>Generating Excel Files On Google App Engine For A Wicket Application &#171; Inphina Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwalmsley.com/?p=220#comment-35970</guid>
		<description>[...] We are porting an existing Wicket application on Google App Engine. This application uses Wicket, Spring and Hibernate. If you read will it play in app engine, you will notice that Wicket is semi compatible and it does work with workarounds. Hibernate on the other hand is incompatible and Spring is fully supported. We began porting this application after changing persistence to use JPA finstead of hibernate. We used workarounds for wicket described here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We are porting an existing Wicket application on Google App Engine. This application uses Wicket, Spring and Hibernate. If you read will it play in app engine, you will notice that Wicket is semi compatible and it does work with workarounds. Hibernate on the other hand is incompatible and Spring is fully supported. We began porting this application after changing persistence to use JPA finstead of hibernate. We used workarounds for wicket described here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Problems When Deploying Working Application on Google App Engine &#171; Inphina Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2009/04/08/apache-wicket-on-google-app-engine-for-java/comment-page-1/#comment-35930</link>
		<dc:creator>Problems When Deploying Working Application on Google App Engine &#171; Inphina Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 13:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwalmsley.com/?p=220#comment-35930</guid>
		<description>[...] use jpa for persistence in Google App engine here. Wicket does work with the workarounds mentioned here. For wicket application we need to enable sessions in app engine config [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] use jpa for persistence in Google App engine here. Wicket does work with the workarounds mentioned here. For wicket application we need to enable sessions in app engine config [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2009/04/08/apache-wicket-on-google-app-engine-for-java/comment-page-1/#comment-33286</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwalmsley.com/?p=220#comment-33286</guid>
		<description>i had to add serialVersionUID to my wicket pages since they are stored in the session and serialized.  I guess they are not required by Eclipse when I create a wicket page.  before i did that, i was receiving an exception like:

javax.servlet.ServletException: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.io.InvalidClassException: wicket.LoginPage; local class incompatible: stream classdesc serialVersionUID</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i had to add serialVersionUID to my wicket pages since they are stored in the session and serialized.  I guess they are not required by Eclipse when I create a wicket page.  before i did that, i was receiving an exception like:</p>
<p>javax.servlet.ServletException: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.io.InvalidClassException: wicket.LoginPage; local class incompatible: stream classdesc serialVersionUID</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tee Bee</title>
		<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2009/04/08/apache-wicket-on-google-app-engine-for-java/comment-page-1/#comment-29361</link>
		<dc:creator>Tee Bee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwalmsley.com/?p=220#comment-29361</guid>
		<description>Hi

I agree that it works fine in Eclipse using the Google appengine plugin, but after deplyoying to Google the first page was ok, but trying to simulate some other pages I get this error: 500 Server error
and the logs is: 

Uncaught exception from servlet
com.google.apphosting.api.ApiProxy$RequestTooLargeException: The request to API call datastore_v3.Put() was too large.

any idea?

regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>I agree that it works fine in Eclipse using the Google appengine plugin, but after deplyoying to Google the first page was ok, but trying to simulate some other pages I get this error: 500 Server error<br />
and the logs is: </p>
<p>Uncaught exception from servlet<br />
com.google.apphosting.api.ApiProxy$RequestTooLargeException: The request to API call datastore_v3.Put() was too large.</p>
<p>any idea?</p>
<p>regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Per</title>
		<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2009/04/08/apache-wicket-on-google-app-engine-for-java/comment-page-1/#comment-28574</link>
		<dc:creator>Per</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 21:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwalmsley.com/?p=220#comment-28574</guid>
		<description>Really been trying this but can&#039;t get it working in the app engine. It works fine in Eclipse but on Google I get a 404 - so I wonder where the difference is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really been trying this but can&#8217;t get it working in the app engine. It works fine in Eclipse but on Google I get a 404 &#8211; so I wonder where the difference is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

