http://www.danwalmsley.com/2009/10/05/git-in-one-minute/ Putting the nerd in comnerdedy Sun, 05 Sep 2010 13:21:40 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.danwalmsley.com/2009/10/05/git-in-one-minute/comment-page-1/#comment-31093 dan Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:38:20 +0000 http://www.danwalmsley.com/?p=324#comment-31093 I saw that Mercurial was adopted by Google, but I haven't used it. It includes Subversion emulation features and has a nicer command line interface. I find git to smell strongly of geek, and until recently I haven't had the mental energy (or need) to really get down-and-dirty with it. However, so many great open source projects are now moving to git that I have a much stronger incentive to learn it than the cleaner-and-nicer mercurial. I saw that Mercurial was adopted by Google, but I haven’t used it. It includes Subversion emulation features and has a nicer command line interface. I find git to smell strongly of geek, and until recently I haven’t had the mental energy (or need) to really get down-and-dirty with it. However, so many great open source projects are now moving to git that I have a much stronger incentive to learn it than the cleaner-and-nicer mercurial.

]]> http://www.danwalmsley.com/2009/10/05/git-in-one-minute/comment-page-1/#comment-31092 the trav Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:08:16 +0000 http://www.danwalmsley.com/?p=324#comment-31092 I started using git for open source stuff not long ago, it's pretty rad. Have you checked out mercurial as all? I'm told it's approximately the same feature wise, but haven't examined it. I started using git for open source stuff not long ago, it’s pretty rad.
Have you checked out mercurial as all? I’m told it’s approximately the same feature wise, but haven’t examined it.

]]>