<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Dan Walmsley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.danwalmsley.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com</link>
	<description>Putting the nerd in comnerdedy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 09:44:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on End the Wicket PermGen issue by Monis Iqbal</title>
		<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2007/12/11/end-the-wicket-permgen-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-33912</link>
		<dc:creator>Monis Iqbal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 09:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwalmsley.com/2007/12/11/end-the-wicket-permgen-issue/#comment-33912</guid>
		<description>Dan, thanks for sharing this. My Wicket app went into PermGen as well after running smoothly for a while. I&#039;ve run into PermGen issues with Spring/Hibernate stack but over there it occurred when we were adding more classes than the PermGen space permitted. Solution was obviously to increase the space but we always ran into PerGen while starting the application.
In contrast, the Wicket app went into PermGen after running for a while, which means that all classes must&#039;ve been loaded but it was something else that caused the issue. I was wondering what scenario is causing PermGen in this case?
And as you&#039;ve also written: &quot;This happens because, by default, the JVM doesn’t reclaim this kind of memory.&quot;
What do you refer &#039;this&#039; to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, thanks for sharing this. My Wicket app went into PermGen as well after running smoothly for a while. I&#8217;ve run into PermGen issues with Spring/Hibernate stack but over there it occurred when we were adding more classes than the PermGen space permitted. Solution was obviously to increase the space but we always ran into PerGen while starting the application.<br />
In contrast, the Wicket app went into PermGen after running for a while, which means that all classes must&#8217;ve been loaded but it was something else that caused the issue. I was wondering what scenario is causing PermGen in this case?<br />
And as you&#8217;ve also written: &#8220;This happens because, by default, the JVM doesn’t reclaim this kind of memory.&#8221;<br />
What do you refer &#8216;this&#8217; to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ACN video phone part VII: Behind the game by dan</title>
		<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2008/06/12/acn-video-phone-part-vii-behind-the-game/comment-page-1/#comment-33701</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwalmsley.com/?p=130#comment-33701</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re absolutely right. When people post opposing opinions on this blog it makes it fun for me - that&#039;s part of the reason I post at all, to create discussion. And if they didn&#039;t, I probably wouldn&#039;t post more articles. They are, as one might say, &quot;feeding the beast&quot;.

However I wouldn&#039;t characterise those posts as &quot;wasting their time&quot; just because I haven&#039;t changed my own opinion. I mean, who cares if I did change my opinion? Who does it effect? Nobody.

No, I&#039;m much more interested in what happens when someone else comes along from Google or elsewhere and reads what&#039;s written and becomes enlightened. And for that, I have to thank everyone who has contributed to this thread. 

Debates like this help to make the world a better place, I think - no matter what I believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right. When people post opposing opinions on this blog it makes it fun for me &#8211; that&#8217;s part of the reason I post at all, to create discussion. And if they didn&#8217;t, I probably wouldn&#8217;t post more articles. They are, as one might say, &#8220;feeding the beast&#8221;.</p>
<p>However I wouldn&#8217;t characterise those posts as &#8220;wasting their time&#8221; just because I haven&#8217;t changed my own opinion. I mean, who cares if I did change my opinion? Who does it effect? Nobody.</p>
<p>No, I&#8217;m much more interested in what happens when someone else comes along from Google or elsewhere and reads what&#8217;s written and becomes enlightened. And for that, I have to thank everyone who has contributed to this thread. </p>
<p>Debates like this help to make the world a better place, I think &#8211; no matter what I believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ACN video phone part VII: Behind the game by bob the builder</title>
		<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2008/06/12/acn-video-phone-part-vii-behind-the-game/comment-page-1/#comment-33452</link>
		<dc:creator>bob the builder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwalmsley.com/?p=130#comment-33452</guid>
		<description>hi there everyone i stumbled upon this by mistake but i would just like to point out to all dans opposition that when you are on here argueing with each other you are wasting your time. so let him play around with his judgements by himself and he will soon get fed up. remember the fact that any one with a computer can say what they want about who they want and have an audience with oppinions FOR OR AGAINST</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi there everyone i stumbled upon this by mistake but i would just like to point out to all dans opposition that when you are on here argueing with each other you are wasting your time. so let him play around with his judgements by himself and he will soon get fed up. remember the fact that any one with a computer can say what they want about who they want and have an audience with oppinions FOR OR AGAINST</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apache Wicket on Google App Engine for Java by bob</title>
		<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2009/04/08/apache-wicket-on-google-app-engine-for-java/comment-page-1/#comment-33286</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwalmsley.com/?p=220#comment-33286</guid>
		<description>i had to add serialVersionUID to my wicket pages since they are stored in the session and serialized.  I guess they are not required by Eclipse when I create a wicket page.  before i did that, i was receiving an exception like:

javax.servlet.ServletException: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.io.InvalidClassException: wicket.LoginPage; local class incompatible: stream classdesc serialVersionUID</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i had to add serialVersionUID to my wicket pages since they are stored in the session and serialized.  I guess they are not required by Eclipse when I create a wicket page.  before i did that, i was receiving an exception like:</p>
<p>javax.servlet.ServletException: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.io.InvalidClassException: wicket.LoginPage; local class incompatible: stream classdesc serialVersionUID</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My slightly crap comparison between ACN and Scientology by LeShawn</title>
		<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2008/08/23/my-slightly-crap-comparison-between-acn-and-scientology/comment-page-1/#comment-32693</link>
		<dc:creator>LeShawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 07:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwalmsley.com/?p=144#comment-32693</guid>
		<description>btw: KeyboardCat.com .. lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw: KeyboardCat.com .. lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Building Google App Engine Java projects with Maven2 by Sudhir</title>
		<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2009/04/07/building-google-app-engine-java-projects-with-maven2/comment-page-1/#comment-32683</link>
		<dc:creator>Sudhir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwalmsley.com/?p=209#comment-32683</guid>
		<description>Vote here if you are looking for maven support in GAE
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1296</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vote here if you are looking for maven support in GAE<br />
<a href="http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1296" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1296</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My slightly crap comparison between ACN and Scientology by dan</title>
		<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2008/08/23/my-slightly-crap-comparison-between-acn-and-scientology/comment-page-1/#comment-32655</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwalmsley.com/?p=144#comment-32655</guid>
		<description>Thanks for a brilliant and insightful post LeShawn. Sounds a lot like my personal experience (though I wasn&#039;t dragged into the Hilton). The rep that I met really convinced me that his company was doing &quot;advanced R&amp;D&quot; into video conferencing technologies. I got the same Donald Trump video, the same crap unsustainable middle-class american lifestyles shoved in my face, etc.

Truly some morally bankrupt people at the top there. I felt sorry for this guy, he was only 19. I tried to arm him with some version of the truth. I hope he&#039;s managed to extricate himself from this thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for a brilliant and insightful post LeShawn. Sounds a lot like my personal experience (though I wasn&#8217;t dragged into the Hilton). The rep that I met really convinced me that his company was doing &#8220;advanced R&amp;D&#8221; into video conferencing technologies. I got the same Donald Trump video, the same crap unsustainable middle-class american lifestyles shoved in my face, etc.</p>
<p>Truly some morally bankrupt people at the top there. I felt sorry for this guy, he was only 19. I tried to arm him with some version of the truth. I hope he&#8217;s managed to extricate himself from this thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My slightly crap comparison between ACN and Scientology by LeShawn</title>
		<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2008/08/23/my-slightly-crap-comparison-between-acn-and-scientology/comment-page-1/#comment-32652</link>
		<dc:creator>LeShawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwalmsley.com/?p=144#comment-32652</guid>
		<description>Well this has been an interesting past few days - since New Year&#039;s Eve - 2009/2010. I met this chap who said he was in the &quot;telecom industry&quot; and since I&#039;ve built a software program for that industry (which I have yet to complete and subsequently market), I thought perhaps I should meet up with him. 

So met the guy on a Saturday at a local Starbucks. A female &quot;associate&quot; of his showed up shortly afterward. Both of them were wearing suits -- on a Saturday right after New Year&#039;s Day. Across the street was a Hilton hotel where they were going to some &quot;business meeting.&quot; I was invited.

So I went and it turned out to be an ACN rally meeting. GROAN. I had never hear of ACN before that day. As a side note these ACN &quot;reps&quot; actually had to PAY to get IN! The bloe who&#039;d invited me paid the $4 entry fee for me.

So I sat there politely, eagerly waiting for my opportunity to &quot;exit stage left.&quot; This environment was the usual get-rich-quick fare you see on late-night TV hawking real-estate courses with no-money-down, complete with a large video screen playing testimonials of successful nobodies. The last shot of the video is Donald Trump telling the audience, you&#039;re either a loser or a winner and by not jumping on this bandwagon, you&#039;re essentially a loser.  Then you had all the clones in suits clapping. After that a speaker comes up on the stage. And though he&#039;s got great stage presence, there&#039;s also something sort of contrived about him as well. He was apparently a successful lawyer who had been able to &quot;reach the same 1,000&#039;s of $$ in 3 years with ACN that had taken him 18 years of law practice to achieve.&quot;

And there are always a few people like this. There are always a FEW people who could sell snow the Eskimos and for f**k&#039;s sake ... he&#039;s a f**king LAWYER! Why trust THAT guy?! lol

The fallacy here is:
Just because a FEW people are hugely successful with ACN that ANY and ALL people can be equally successful. This is an incorrect and false conclusion that the bulk of ACN suckers  succumb to.

The last time I got roped into an MLM was about 20 years ago. I was really gung-ho about it and failed miserably. Beyond that, and much more importantly, I was asked to &quot;believe more strongly.&quot; And as a result of this, ended up alienating family and friends. 

The reasoning goes a bit like this:
&quot;You should really believe in this product/program 100% and if someone in your life doesn&#039;t support you, they are just losers who don&#039;t want you to be successful.&quot;

It therefore becomes not only a religion, but a cult. This causes a person&#039;s mind to create an artificial division between &quot;us&quot; and &quot;them.&quot; The &quot;winners&quot; and the &quot;losers.&quot; 

And over what? Some sub-standard, over-priced MLM product that 99% of the population can do without and never miss.

Even while in the presence of these ACN people I felt like I was in the midst of a cult. Just something unnatural about it. There&#039;s something very clone-like about them. And if you really look at the program from the top-down this is actually by design. This is what I might call the Zombie Business Model. Create 1 Zombie and get that Zombie to create 2 Zombies below him. Rinse and repeat.

So upon returning home, I began to research ACN, something I didn&#039;t have the benefit of doing while at the &quot;training seminar.&quot; My suspicions were confirmed. 

Beyond that I was vaguely reminded the 2 or 3 encounters (back in the mid 90&#039;s) I&#039;ve had with members of the Church of Scientology. And this lead me to examine what is now available on the web on them and other cults.

Principally it led me to discover the top generals of Scientology, David Miscavige and Tommy Davis. Interestingly they both appear to have the same artificial, overbearing, in-your-face personalities. In fact, I&#039;d almost argue these are not personalities at all, but the absence of personality. Tom Cruise seems to have devolved into this same kind of non-human. 

AND -- based upon my observations, both recently and over the years, I&#039;d even go so far as to say that cults (both Scientology and MLMs) are all about the destruction of personality. Positive thinking and looking at the glass as half-full is one thing, but only insofar as it is helpful, and doesn&#039;t blind people to a wider spectrum of possibilities. 

A simple example is the development and implementation of passenger safety in automobiles. Before this science was invented, it was commonly thought that survival of collision was largely &quot;the will of God.&quot; 

Sure, you can go about saying to yourself, &quot;Only people who THINK they will get into a collision WILL, so all I have to do is think the right thoughts.&quot; By doing this you have restricted yourself to one set of eventualities. You don&#039;t allow yourself to contemplate, &quot;What if I get into a crash?&quot; The balanced mind allows for both eventualities. &quot;I don&#039;t expect to get into a crash, but IF I do, I&#039;m preparing for the small chance by 1) buying a safer car 2) using my seat belt 3) etc.&quot; By doing this, you reduce the impact of unforeseen events.

While ACN is not as dangerous or destructive to an individual or his/her family as Scientology, there is definitely a certain amount of overlap. By their very design - recruit family &amp; friends and divorcing oneself from non-believers - a schism is created.

To anyone who is seriously considering &quot;joining&quot; ACN, I would advise you to look deeper within yourself. What are your special talents and abilities? Why were you put here on this planet? To sell plastic video-phones? (yesterday&#039;s technology btw) Or is there something you&#039;d much rather do? What is it that you can share with the world that will give you and the others around you joy and happiness?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this has been an interesting past few days &#8211; since New Year&#8217;s Eve &#8211; 2009/2010. I met this chap who said he was in the &#8220;telecom industry&#8221; and since I&#8217;ve built a software program for that industry (which I have yet to complete and subsequently market), I thought perhaps I should meet up with him. </p>
<p>So met the guy on a Saturday at a local Starbucks. A female &#8220;associate&#8221; of his showed up shortly afterward. Both of them were wearing suits &#8212; on a Saturday right after New Year&#8217;s Day. Across the street was a Hilton hotel where they were going to some &#8220;business meeting.&#8221; I was invited.</p>
<p>So I went and it turned out to be an ACN rally meeting. GROAN. I had never hear of ACN before that day. As a side note these ACN &#8220;reps&#8221; actually had to PAY to get IN! The bloe who&#8217;d invited me paid the $4 entry fee for me.</p>
<p>So I sat there politely, eagerly waiting for my opportunity to &#8220;exit stage left.&#8221; This environment was the usual get-rich-quick fare you see on late-night TV hawking real-estate courses with no-money-down, complete with a large video screen playing testimonials of successful nobodies. The last shot of the video is Donald Trump telling the audience, you&#8217;re either a loser or a winner and by not jumping on this bandwagon, you&#8217;re essentially a loser.  Then you had all the clones in suits clapping. After that a speaker comes up on the stage. And though he&#8217;s got great stage presence, there&#8217;s also something sort of contrived about him as well. He was apparently a successful lawyer who had been able to &#8220;reach the same 1,000&#8217;s of $$ in 3 years with ACN that had taken him 18 years of law practice to achieve.&#8221;</p>
<p>And there are always a few people like this. There are always a FEW people who could sell snow the Eskimos and for f**k&#8217;s sake &#8230; he&#8217;s a f**king LAWYER! Why trust THAT guy?! lol</p>
<p>The fallacy here is:<br />
Just because a FEW people are hugely successful with ACN that ANY and ALL people can be equally successful. This is an incorrect and false conclusion that the bulk of ACN suckers  succumb to.</p>
<p>The last time I got roped into an MLM was about 20 years ago. I was really gung-ho about it and failed miserably. Beyond that, and much more importantly, I was asked to &#8220;believe more strongly.&#8221; And as a result of this, ended up alienating family and friends. </p>
<p>The reasoning goes a bit like this:<br />
&#8220;You should really believe in this product/program 100% and if someone in your life doesn&#8217;t support you, they are just losers who don&#8217;t want you to be successful.&#8221;</p>
<p>It therefore becomes not only a religion, but a cult. This causes a person&#8217;s mind to create an artificial division between &#8220;us&#8221; and &#8220;them.&#8221; The &#8220;winners&#8221; and the &#8220;losers.&#8221; </p>
<p>And over what? Some sub-standard, over-priced MLM product that 99% of the population can do without and never miss.</p>
<p>Even while in the presence of these ACN people I felt like I was in the midst of a cult. Just something unnatural about it. There&#8217;s something very clone-like about them. And if you really look at the program from the top-down this is actually by design. This is what I might call the Zombie Business Model. Create 1 Zombie and get that Zombie to create 2 Zombies below him. Rinse and repeat.</p>
<p>So upon returning home, I began to research ACN, something I didn&#8217;t have the benefit of doing while at the &#8220;training seminar.&#8221; My suspicions were confirmed. </p>
<p>Beyond that I was vaguely reminded the 2 or 3 encounters (back in the mid 90&#8217;s) I&#8217;ve had with members of the Church of Scientology. And this lead me to examine what is now available on the web on them and other cults.</p>
<p>Principally it led me to discover the top generals of Scientology, David Miscavige and Tommy Davis. Interestingly they both appear to have the same artificial, overbearing, in-your-face personalities. In fact, I&#8217;d almost argue these are not personalities at all, but the absence of personality. Tom Cruise seems to have devolved into this same kind of non-human. </p>
<p>AND &#8212; based upon my observations, both recently and over the years, I&#8217;d even go so far as to say that cults (both Scientology and MLMs) are all about the destruction of personality. Positive thinking and looking at the glass as half-full is one thing, but only insofar as it is helpful, and doesn&#8217;t blind people to a wider spectrum of possibilities. </p>
<p>A simple example is the development and implementation of passenger safety in automobiles. Before this science was invented, it was commonly thought that survival of collision was largely &#8220;the will of God.&#8221; </p>
<p>Sure, you can go about saying to yourself, &#8220;Only people who THINK they will get into a collision WILL, so all I have to do is think the right thoughts.&#8221; By doing this you have restricted yourself to one set of eventualities. You don&#8217;t allow yourself to contemplate, &#8220;What if I get into a crash?&#8221; The balanced mind allows for both eventualities. &#8220;I don&#8217;t expect to get into a crash, but IF I do, I&#8217;m preparing for the small chance by 1) buying a safer car 2) using my seat belt 3) etc.&#8221; By doing this, you reduce the impact of unforeseen events.</p>
<p>While ACN is not as dangerous or destructive to an individual or his/her family as Scientology, there is definitely a certain amount of overlap. By their very design &#8211; recruit family &amp; friends and divorcing oneself from non-believers &#8211; a schism is created.</p>
<p>To anyone who is seriously considering &#8220;joining&#8221; ACN, I would advise you to look deeper within yourself. What are your special talents and abilities? Why were you put here on this planet? To sell plastic video-phones? (yesterday&#8217;s technology btw) Or is there something you&#8217;d much rather do? What is it that you can share with the world that will give you and the others around you joy and happiness?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ACN video phone part VII: Behind the game by dan</title>
		<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2008/06/12/acn-video-phone-part-vii-behind-the-game/comment-page-1/#comment-32110</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwalmsley.com/?p=130#comment-32110</guid>
		<description>Yes indeed, because I&#039;m sure the contract says &quot;we will turn your family against you&quot;.

There is a distinction between &quot;legal framework&quot; and &quot;operating practices&quot;. What&#039;s more it&#039;s quite clear from my direct interaction with a salesperson that ACN exploits the naivete and aspirations of potential resellers. 

Most people aren&#039;t capable of understanding a complex legal agreement, let alone all the ramifications. Particularly people who haven&#039;t been in business before.

Therefore it is incumbent upon ACN to operate ethically, or upon the government to stop them from doing business. This is why ACN was investigated by the Australian Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman for potential violations of the Trade Practices Act because they were behaving like a pyramid scheme. 

Say what you like about the fact that ACN avoided conviction - they don&#039;t investigate for nothing. As far as I can tell both customers and resellers have nothing but complaints, or at least apathy, towards ACN&#039;s service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes indeed, because I&#8217;m sure the contract says &#8220;we will turn your family against you&#8221;.</p>
<p>There is a distinction between &#8220;legal framework&#8221; and &#8220;operating practices&#8221;. What&#8217;s more it&#8217;s quite clear from my direct interaction with a salesperson that ACN exploits the naivete and aspirations of potential resellers. </p>
<p>Most people aren&#8217;t capable of understanding a complex legal agreement, let alone all the ramifications. Particularly people who haven&#8217;t been in business before.</p>
<p>Therefore it is incumbent upon ACN to operate ethically, or upon the government to stop them from doing business. This is why ACN was investigated by the Australian Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman for potential violations of the Trade Practices Act because they were behaving like a pyramid scheme. </p>
<p>Say what you like about the fact that ACN avoided conviction &#8211; they don&#8217;t investigate for nothing. As far as I can tell both customers and resellers have nothing but complaints, or at least apathy, towards ACN&#8217;s service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ACN video phone part VII: Behind the game by Francisco Rodgers</title>
		<link>http://www.danwalmsley.com/2008/06/12/acn-video-phone-part-vii-behind-the-game/comment-page-1/#comment-32109</link>
		<dc:creator>Francisco Rodgers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danwalmsley.com/?p=130#comment-32109</guid>
		<description>If everyone would simply do the research prior to the signing of the contract then they could choose to sign up or not to sign. If you sign up don&#039;t blame anyone but yourself. Have some ownership in your choice to join the company. The bible says hard work leads to profit and mere talk leads to poverty. Is this considered mere talk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If everyone would simply do the research prior to the signing of the contract then they could choose to sign up or not to sign. If you sign up don&#8217;t blame anyone but yourself. Have some ownership in your choice to join the company. The bible says hard work leads to profit and mere talk leads to poverty. Is this considered mere talk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
